DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS |
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BC
Docket No: 00639-14
12 March 2024
This is in reference to your application for correction of your |
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
“A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 March. 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.
After. careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error Or
injustice.
You enlisted. in the Marine Corps on 6 June 1995. "Between is
June and 20 July 1995, you received-12 counseling’s concerning
your failure to. obey orders and misbehaving during training
period. On 20 July 1995, you received nonjudicial punishment
(NJP) for being disrespectful toward a senior noncommissioned
.officer and disobeying a lawful order. On 21 July 1995, you -
were informed that administrative separation procedures were
initiated and you waived all of your rights. On 24 July 1995,
“your commanding officer forwarded his recommendation. that you-be
Separated by reason of entry level performance or conduct. The
discharge authority agreed and directed an uncharacterized entry
level separation. You were’ sO discharged on 26 July 1995, and
‘assigned an RE- -3F reentry code, as required by governing |
directives.
that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason
of entry level performance or conduct with minor disciplinary
infractions during initial training. The alternative is an RE-4
‘(not recommended for retention). As you were not eligible or
recommended for reenlistment, a code of RE-1 was not authorized.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. . oO -
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are.such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
. Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00471-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board believed that a record which includes two nonjudicial punishments, several counseling entries, and an alcohol related incident after...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07580-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 12 June 1986 and served in an active status until 23 May 1991...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01825-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2011. On 13 October 1995 you were given a diagnosis of asthma, which was considered disqualifying for enlistment and not correctable to meet Navy standards. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval trecord, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the pexistence of probq@ble material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06922-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injueeiee.. You entered active duty in the Navy on 21 June 1995, and while in recruit training, you injured your back and sought medical help. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04906-07
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00069-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3J reenlistment code when an individual in an entry level status tests positive for marijuana use, served less than 30 days in the DEP, confessed to the use of marijuana during the moment of truth, and was processed for separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09458-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. of fraudulent entry due to failure to disclose your prior service, history of psychiatric treatment, and the diagnosis of a delusional disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, and a paranoid personality disorder. Further, the Board concluded that your diagnosed psychiatric disorders were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03990-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found no evidence that the diagnosis of adjustment disorder was incorrect. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09261-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2009. On 28 June 1995, you were diagnosed with a schizoid personality disorder, and found to be a danger to yourself and others if not administratively separated. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant ‘to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08162-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together-with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 11 January 1995. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.